ScopeRank

Transparent quality rankings for colonoscopy providers across the United States, based on evidence-based performance metrics.

Loading providers from NPI Registry…
Ranked Providers
Average ADR
Avg. Withdrawal Time
Avg. Cecal Intubation Rate
# Provider Location Score ADR Withdrawal Time Cecal Intubation Rate Cases / Year
Data Notice: Provider names, credentials, and locations are sourced from the CMS NPI Registry. Quality metrics (ADR, withdrawal time, cecal intubation rate, case volume) are self-reported by providers and have not been independently verified. Providers without reported metrics are shown as "Not Reported" and are not ranked.
Excellent Good Fair Below Benchmark
All Providers 20

Why These Four Metrics?

Colonoscopy quality varies significantly between providers — and that variation has real consequences for patient outcomes. Research shows that patients of low-ADR endoscopists are up to 10× more likely to develop interval colorectal cancer (cancer diagnosed within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy) compared to patients of high-ADR endoscopists. The four metrics below are endorsed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), and the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer as the primary indicators of colonoscopy quality.

Adenoma Detection Rate

ADR

ADR is the percentage of screening colonoscopies in which at least one adenoma (precancerous polyp) is found. It is the single most important predictor of whether a colonoscopy will prevent colorectal cancer. An endoscopist who carefully inspects the colon lining, uses adequate withdrawal time, and flattens folds will detect more adenomas — and each 1% increase in ADR is associated with a 3% decrease in the risk of interval colorectal cancer.

National Benchmarks
Excellent (target)≥ 35%
Good (quality threshold)≥ 25%
Minimum acceptable≥ 20%

Withdrawal Time

WT

Withdrawal time is the time spent pulling the scope back out through the colon after reaching the cecum. This is when most polyps are found. Rushing the withdrawal phase is a major cause of missed lesions. Multiple studies have shown that endoscopists with withdrawal times under 6 minutes miss significantly more adenomas. A minimum of 6 minutes is required; high-quality endoscopists average 8–12 minutes on negative exams.

National Benchmarks
Excellent≥ 10 min
Good≥ 8 min
Minimum (ASGE/ACG mandate)≥ 6 min

Annual Case Volume

VOLUME

Volume is a proxy for experience and skill maintenance. Like any procedural skill, colonoscopy competence correlates with how frequently it is performed. Higher-volume endoscopists have lower complication rates, higher cecal intubation rates, and typically better ADR. The ASGE recommends a minimum of 200 procedures to establish initial competency, with ongoing volume needed to maintain it.

Volume Indicators
High volume≥ 900 / year
Moderate volume≥ 500 / year
Minimum for competency≥ 100 / year

Cecal Intubation Rate

CIR

The cecal intubation rate measures how often the endoscopist successfully reaches the cecum — the very end of the large intestine. A colonoscopy that doesn't reach the cecum is incomplete: the right colon, where many flat and serrated polyps are found, goes uninspected. Failure to intubate is caused by looping, anatomical difficulty, or inadequate technique. Photo documentation of the cecum is required for verification.

National Benchmarks
Excellent≥ 98%
Good≥ 95%
Minimum (ASGE/ACG mandate)≥ 90%

Who Is Licensed to Perform Colonoscopy in the US?

In the United States, colonoscopy is a privileged procedure — providers must hold an appropriate medical license and receive hospital or ambulatory surgery center (ASC) credentialing that specifically grants colonoscopy privileges. Credentialing bodies evaluate training, case logs, and complication rates. The following provider types may be credentialed to perform colonoscopy, though scope-of-practice laws vary by state.

Gastroenterologists (MD / DO)

The primary specialty for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology fellowship (3 years post-residency) includes intensive endoscopy training with 140–200 required colonoscopies as a minimum. GI specialists perform the vast majority of colonoscopies in the US and have the highest average ADRs as a group.

Colorectal Surgeons (MD / DO)

Colorectal surgery fellowship includes colonoscopy training. Colorectal surgeons routinely perform diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies, particularly in patients with surgical conditions such as colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease requiring operative management.

General Surgeons (MD / DO)

General surgery residency includes endoscopy training. General surgeons in rural or community settings often perform colonoscopies where subspecialist access is limited. Their privileges must be granted by the credentialing committee of each facility where they practice.

Internists & Family Medicine (MD / DO)

Historically, some internists performed colonoscopies. This is now rare in academic and urban settings but still occurs in underserved communities where access to GI specialists is limited. Competency must be demonstrated through case logs and outcomes data.

Nurse Practitioners (NP)

In select states with full practice authority, highly trained NPs have received colonoscopy privileges at specific institutions, typically in collaborative practice models with supervising gastroenterologists. This is not widespread but is expanding in rural health shortage areas.

Physician Assistants (PA)

PAs working in GI practices may be trained to perform colonoscopies under physician supervision in some states and institutions. As with NPs, formal credentialing and demonstrated competency are required. Several studies have shown that trained PAs can achieve quality metrics comparable to physician endoscopists.

Note: Scope of practice for advanced practice providers (NPs and PAs) varies by state law. Always verify that a provider holds current, active licensure in their state and has been granted colonoscopy privileges by the institution where they practice.

How the Composite Score Is Calculated

The composite quality score (0–100) is a weighted index of the four evidence-based metrics. Weights reflect each metric's relative strength of association with patient outcomes in the published literature. The ADR carries the highest weight because it has the strongest direct link to colorectal cancer prevention.

Metric Weights

Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
40%
Cecal Intubation Rate (CIR)
25%
Withdrawal Time
20%
Annual Case Volume
15%

Score Legend

75–100   Excellent 55–74   Good 35–54   Fair 0–34   Below Benchmark
Methodology Note: Each metric is normalized on a 0–1 scale relative to clinically established floor and ceiling values before weighting. The floors are the minimum acceptable ASGE/ACG benchmarks; ceilings represent the top of observed performance ranges nationally. Providers below the minimum threshold on any metric are flagged as below benchmark regardless of composite score. This scoring model is for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute a clinical endorsement.

Key References

  • Corley DA et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. NEJM 2014;370:1298–1306.
  • Rex DK et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:31–53.
  • Barclay RL et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. NEJM 2006;355:2533–2541.
  • ASGE/ACG Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873–885.
  • Kaminski MF et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. NEJM 2010;362:1795–1803.